Share this intervention

  • 0.02,1.00

Summary

Work Plus allowed newly employed Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients to reduce work participation (to 20 hours per week) in order to pursue education and training opportunities. 

To continue to receive benefits, TANF participants were required to engage in employment-related activities for 32 hours per week. Program staff encouraged TANF participants in the Work Plus intervention to decrease work hours per week to 20 hours to pursue education and training activities, with the philosophy that working reinforced the value of education and training and that working while in school or training increased the likelihood of program completion and the use of newly attained skills. Participation in education and training was voluntary, but if participants chose not to pursue education and training, they were required to participate in other permitted activities—including work—for at least 32 hours per week. Participants received intensive case management services, including access and referrals to mental health, domestic violence, and substance use treatment services. Participants were also automatically eligible for supportive services, including child care and transportation assistance, which would otherwise have required enrolling in a separate program. Services continued as long as participants remained employed. If participants became unemployed, they could continue Work Plus services for up to 60 days before being transferred to a separate, job-search services program. The program was available to TANF recipients who had worked at the state minimum wage or higher for at least 20 hours in one or more weeks in the prior month. Participants also had to have completed a preemployment program and expect to be working at least 20 hours per week on average for the next month. Work Plus was implemented in Riverside County, CA. The evaluation also tested a Training Focused intervention and compared the effects of the Work Plus and Training Focused interventions.

Populations and employment barriers: Cash assistance recipients, Employed, Parents
Populations and employment barriers: Cash assistance recipients, Employed, Parents, Single parents

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

Need more context or definitions for the Outcome Domain table below?
View the "Table help" to get more insight into terms, measures, and definitions.

View table help

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2018 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term Little evidence to assess support favorable $439 per year 0.021 2285
Long-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable $-460 per year -0.022 2638
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase employment Short-term Little evidence to assess support favorable 1% (in percentage points) 0.022 2285
Long-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable -1% (in percentage points) -0.018 2638
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term Mixed support favorable $-58 per year -0.021 2285
Long-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable $66 per year 0.024 2285
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods No evidence to assess support

Studies of this intervention

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 2

Implementation details

Characteristics of research participants
Black or African American
20%
White, not Hispanic
33%
Another race
3%
Hispanic or Latino of any race
43%

The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.