• 0.14,3.00
  • 0.14,3.00
  • 0.21,3.00

The National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program aimed to improve the lives of youth who were out of school and under- or unemployed by providing education, development, and mentorship.

The National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program aimed to improve the lives of  youth who were out of school and under- or unemployed by providing education, development, and mentorship. 

The ChalleNGe program consisted of three phases. In the first phase, participants attended a two-week, intensive orientation and assessment. Following this orientation, participants were formally enrolled in the program and considered cadets. The cadets then began phase two, which consisted of a 20-week education program focused on preparation for the GED exam and positive youth development. Phases one and two required the cadets to live on-site and experience a quasi-military environment. During phase three, the cadets participated in a yearlong, nonresidential structured mentoring program. The ChalleNGe program aimed to recruit disconnected youth between the ages of 16 and 18 who had dropped out of school and were not employed. Program applicants were required to be drug-free and not currently on parole or probation (other than juvenile status offenses), not serving time or awaiting sentencing, and not convicted of a felony or capital offense. Ten ChalleNGe programs were evaluated: Camp San Luis Obispo, CA; Camp Blanding, FL; Fort Gordon, GA; Rantoul, IL; Battle Creek, MI; Camp Shelby, MS; Roswell, NM; Salemburg, NC; Galveston, TX; and Fort McCoy, WI.

Year evaluation began: 2005
Populations and employment barriers: Less than high school diploma or GED, Young adults (aged 16-24)
Intervention services: Case management, Education, Soft skills training, Work readiness activities, Job search assistance
Setting(s): Tested in multiple settings

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

Back to top
View table help Need more context or definitions for the Outcome Domain table below? View the "Table help" to get more insight into terms, measures, and definitions.

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2018 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term No evidence to assess support
Long-term Supported favorable $2,991 per year 0.143 1173
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase employment Short-term No evidence to assess support
Long-term Supported favorable 6% (in percentage points) 0.143 1173
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term No evidence to assess support
Long-term No evidence to assess support
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods Supported favorable 11% (in percentage points) 0.213 1173

Studies of this intervention

Back to top
Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 1