Share this intervention

  • -0.44,1.50
  • 0.01,1.50

Summary

The STEP program provided Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients with intensive case management and other supports to help them overcome barriers to employment and secure jobs. This evaluation directly compared STEP to a separate intervention, TWC, in order to better understand which of the two interventions might be more effective; the distinctive feature of STEP when compared to TWC is a focus on intensive case management to address specific barriers to employment.

STEP participants received home visits from community liaisons to identify and mitigate any barriers that might prevent participants from traveling to the program offices. In the program offices, participants were assigned a case coordinator, who conducted assessments to determine barriers to employment. Case coordinators worked with no more than 20 participants at a time. The case coordinator and specialized vocational rehabilitation staff developed a plan to address the barriers, and participants began activities tailored to overcoming their barriers. Activities included life-skills classes, adult basic education classes, GED preparation, English classes, support groups, professional development, counseling, computer classes, and behavioral coaching. Some classes were available at STEP program offices, and others were available through referrals to other organizations in the community. The duration of services varied based on participants’ needs and motivations. After case coordinators determined that participants were ready, participants worked with job coaches and job developers to find permanent employment. STEP offered bonuses of $20 to $125 to participants for finding employment and bonuses of $50 after 90 days of employment. STEP participants were TANF recipients who were not exempt from the TANF requirement to participate in work activities. The STEP program was run by the Jewish Employment and Vocational Service organization in Philadelphia, PA.

This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of STEP when compared to TWC. As a result, the findings from this evaluation indicate the effect of being referred to a set of services that are unique to STEP or how much better the offer of STEP met participants’ needs than the offer of TWC. Both programs offered support in identifying and securing permanent, unsubsidized employment. However, STEP focused on intensive case management to address specific barriers to employment, whereas TWC’s program focused on subsidized employment and offered job retention bonuses. The Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration also evaluated TWC’s program and STEP independently.

Populations and employment barriers: Cash assistance recipients, Unemployed

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

Need more context or definitions for the Outcome Domain table below?
View the "Table help" to get more insight into terms, measures, and definitions.

View table help

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2018 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term Little evidence to assess support $0 per year 0.000 0
Long-term No evidence to assess support
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase employment Short-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable -18% (in percentage points) -0.443 1456
Long-term No evidence to assess support
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term Little evidence to assess support favorable $-33 per year -0.012 1456
Long-term No evidence to assess support
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods No evidence to assess support

Studies of this intervention

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 1

Implementation details

Characteristics of research participants
Black or African American
82%
White, not Hispanic
3%
Another race
1%
Hispanic or Latino of any race
14%

The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.